Friday, July 31, 2009

Love Aaj Kal


Rating : 6/10
Release Date : 30th July, ‘09
Time : 130 minutes
Director & Writer : Imtiaz Ali; Music : Pritam
Starring : Saif Ali Khan, Deepika Padukone, Giselle Monteiro, Rishi Kapoor, Rahul Khanna, Raj Zutshi

What keeps this film going is the dialogue – its very natural, not filmi, relaxed and very Delhi types lingo. What doesn’t are the character developments, especially in the second half and the situations (which unfortunately were a bit filmi), again, especially in the second half.




Life is a lark for Jai and Meera (Saif and Deepika). They’re based in the UK, they’re young, beautiful and together, all is fine with the world. One day though, they decide to break up. For purely practical reasons. Meera’s job and passion is taking her to India and Jai’s is probably taking him to San Francisco. And they both know long distance relationships don’t work. So, rather than become a mill-stone around each others neck, they decide to be sensible and break up right away, so that they retain good memories of each other. Heck, they even throw a ‘break-up’ party.

Jai now meets Veer ji (Rishi Kapoor), who’s seen the two of them together at his coffee shop and insists Jai is doing the wrong thing by letting her walk away. He tells his story, a kind of flashback, of his courtship in the good old days, when there was shame and modesty and true love. Jai doesn’t really understand the emotion, is not sure what is love, but listens to the story anyways.

Their – Jai’s and Meera’s - lives move on. They date other people. They chat with each other. But the true question is, can they move on from each other, make a new beginning ?

What I liked is that the fun and the sense of humour never really stopped. It never became too serious or too soppy. And Imtiaz Ali clearly knows the pulse of the Punjabi’s – the funny nicknames (Sunny weds Pammi), the obligatory booze in the dickey (boot) in all weddings etc. I loved the advice Jai and Meera gave each other shortly after the break up – they felt free to talk and no longer hesitant to share stuff like ‘your red shoes, which you think are great, are actually terrible and everyone makes fun of them’ or ‘be careful how you use that smile – it can cause havoc in the opposing person’. And the Veerji romance with Harleen Kaur was well depicted, made you smile, was quaint and cute and cuddly.

I also cant fault any of the performances. Saif has this unique ability – as the lovable ruffian / rascal – to really make you believe he is exactly the character being shown on screen. He wins your trust and gains your credibility. Deepika, I felt, performed a lot better than lot of people give her credit for. Not just a pretty face, this babe from Bangalore. Rishi Kapoor reminded us, why he was the original lovable ruffian. And Giselle (curiously not even mentioned on the official website), as Harleen, got her simpering and modest glances down pat.


But I don’t think I really understood what the characters were feeling. Especially Jai. And to an extent Meera. Never understood the thoughts going on inside their head. Some of their reactions came as a bolt from the blue and that didn’t feel right. Some of the situations felt unnatural and that didn’t feel right.


This film suffers from the ghosts of some of the other great ‘romantic comedies’ like Dil Chahta Hai, Jab We Met (Imtiaz’s earlier film) and Hum Tum. And unfortunately, while it has shades of each of the three, it never rises to their level. I don’t think any song has shown the angst of separation as ‘Tanhai’ did in DCH. Or the now on, now off situation like Hum Tum (or ‘When Harry Met Sally’). And the very natural plot construction of ‘Jab We Met’, where you understand the characters and none of their choices seem forced. Its also supposedly borrowed a concept or two from a Taiwanese film ‘Three Times’.

In this one, you feel a bit incomplete when you walk out. It was fun and frothy to an extent. And nice, and charming, and quaint. But not all the way…

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

In Bruges


Rating : 7/10
Release Date : June ‘08
Time : 107 minutes
Director & Writer : Martin McDonagh
Starring : Colin Farrell, Brendan Gleeson, Ralph Fiennes, Clemence Peosy


Colin: After I killed him, I dropped the gun in the Thames, washed the residue off me hands in the bathroom of a Burger King, and walked home to await instructions. Shortly thereafter the instructions came through - "Get the fuck out of London, you dumb fucks. Get to Bruges." I didn't even know where Bruges fucking was.
[pause]
Colin: It's in Belgium

Hilariously funny first half, and I mean almost hysterically funny, switches gears in the second, almost becoming a different film. Am not sure the ending is what I would’ve written, but my abiding memory was of the very, very funny characters and the very, very funny first half.

Two assassins are sent to Bruges (its in Belgium as Colin Farrell also discovers!) to lie low after a kind of botched assignment. Colin, an Irishman, comes in thinking its going to a shithole and he sees nothing that convinces him otherwise. The medieval beauty of the place, passes him by, while it enchants his partner, Brendan, who is more inclined towards history and culture.



They find out they have to share a room, they find they have nothing in common, they realise they may have to wait longer than they anticipated and this agitates Colin, who would rather be back in the UK. Brendan, the elder partner, is calmer about it, more mature and willing to go with their boss, Harry's instructions, which were to wait for his call. The call, finally comes, but they’re out of the hotel, resulting in them receiving an F-word filled message from Harry via the hotel receptionist (or co-owner as she not so subtly points out). When he does get through, the fun begins. Am not saying anything more for fear of taking away the surprise.


Suffice to say, we witness English / Irish humour at its best, we meet crazy characters including a midget, who is the hero of a film being shot in Bruges, a very pretty producer whom Colin is instantly besotted with, her ex-boyfriend who doesn’t take too kindly to Colin’s advances, some ‘elephantine’ American tourists who don’t take kindly to jokes about their size and a tower attendant who is rude in a very ‘dutch’ kind of way and petty down to the last ten cents (again in a very Flemish kind of way).

The second half went in a different direction, becoming much more serious. It was still interesting, keeps you hooked but the abiding memory, even when its all over is of Colin swearing at everything around him in his fake Irish brogue. And that was just one of the things that was hilariously funny….

Brendan: We shall strike a balance between culture and fun.
Colin : Somehow I believe, Ken, that the balance shall tip in the favor of culture, like a big fat fucking retarded fucking black girl on a see-saw opposite... a dwarf.

Colin : [beating a tourist that he believes to be American] That's for John Lennon, you Yankee fuckin' cunt!

Clemence: There's never been a classic movie made in Bruges until now.
Colin : Of course there hasn't. It's a shithole.
Clemence: Bruges is my home town, Ray.
Colin: Well, it's still a shithole.
Clemence: It's not a shithole!
Colin: What? Even midgets have to take drugs to stick it.
Clemence: Okay. So, you've insulted my home town. You were doing really well, Raymond. Why don't you tell me some Belgium jokes while you're at it?
Colin: Don't know any Belgium jokes, and if I did I think I'd have the good sense not to... hang on. Is Belgium with all those child abuse murders lately? I do know a Belgium joke. What's Belgium famous for? Chocolates and child abuse, and they only invented the chocolates to get to the kids.
[Ray sees Chloe's shocked expression]
Colin: What?
Clemence: One of the girls they murdered was a friend of mine.


I think it was brilliant – and all the above is just a sample…there's more, plenty more. Enjoy !

Married Life


Rating : 4/10
Release Date : Mar ‘08
Time : 91 minutes
Director & Co-writer : Ira Sachs; Co-Writer : Oren Moverman
Starring : Pierce Brosnan, Chris Cooper, Patricia Clarkson, Rachel McAdams

Slow moving period drama about crossed connections. A married man falling for a younger woman feels that he cannot leave his wife as she wouldn’t be able to bear it. But he wants the happiness & companionship that the younger one provides. He confides to one of his really close friends, Pierce Brosnan, who after one look at the girl, promptly decides he must have the girl for himself.



How this complicated web is woven and unwoven, is what the movie is about. I think, the pace and the ordinary-ness of the characters we witness, is what goes against the film. All the performances, possibly deliberately, are muted. And the whole film kind of gets over without our even realising it. One of Pierce Brosnan’s most underplayed roles for sure.

Nothing much here to make me recommend it too much, unless you’re a diehard Pierce fan.

Dashavtharam


Rating : 5/10
Release Date : June ‘08
Time : 189 minutes
Director : KS Ravikumar; Writer : Kamal Hassan;
Starring : Kamal Hassan, Asin, Mallika Sherawat

Kind of like Sivaji, this is an out and out star vehicle. Just Kamal Hasan instead of Rajni. All else is equally implausible. And we see Kamal in ten different disguises, essaying roles as vastly different as a devout Brahmin in the medieval ages to an American assassin to a Punjabi song-belting Sardarji to a Japanese kung-fu master. We see Asin portray the role of the ‘janam-janam’ ki wife, keeping pace with her husband in all era’s.


We see why / how even the Tsunami could’ve done some good, how biological weapons could be deadlier than nuclear ones, how the state- both in USA and India –could easily be misled. I really liked Kamal’s performance as the Brahmin – the rest of the performances were hidden by too much make-up. Asin was good, too much screaming possibly, but that was hardly her fault.


Again, as in Sivaji, unlikely that we will have too many more such grand epics from Kamal Hasan. So for that reason, and that reason alone, it may be worth a watch. Else, I couldn’t understand what the hype was about.

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Luck


Rating : 4/10
Release Date : 24th July, ‘09
Time : 130 minutes
Director & Co-Writer : Soham Shah; Co-writer : Renzil D’Silva; Music : Salim-Sulaiman
Starring : Imran Khan, Mithun Chakraborty, Sanjay Dutt, Danny Dengzopa, Shruti Hasan, Ravi Kishan, Chitrashi Rawat

There used to be this PJ in our college days, the type that comes on 9X’s ‘Bakwaas Band Kar’ these days.

“Ek baar char ande (eggs) fall from the top floor of a very tall building (Empire State, if you so please). Girte, girte, who sab zameen par gir padte hain. Saare toot jaate hain bas ek ande ko kuch nahin hota. Ek scratch bhi nahin aata. Batao kyun ? Kyunki Jaako Raakhe Saayan, Maar sake Na koye…”
That PJ about sums up the film and despite copying from some very good films like 13 Tzameti and detective stories like Byomkesh Bakshi’s ‘The Porcupine Quill’, they’ve still managed to make a hash of it. A hi-adrenalin first half gives way to an increasingly implausible and convoluted second where unnecessary love, revenge and jealousy angles detract from the main, simple storyline, which I wish they’d left alone.



A betting syndicate, run by Sanjay Dutt, ferrets out lucky people (via a slightly bleached looking Danny Dengzopa) and then makes them go through various death defying feats, in which only the survivors win. The first half still manages to hold it together as we find out these ‘lucky’ people, we play some funny games including the one with the lighter, we find out what are the different compulsions which are making people accept to be a part of this enterprise etc. Along with the sub-continental lucky ones, there are also some foreigners added in (some of them strangely speaking Hindi) but these are only as ballast.

Some of the little inconsistencies that made me cringe
• Why was a serving Major-General having to go to private hospitals and cough up huge amounts for an operation on his wife ? Haven’t the producers heard of Command Hospitals ? They’re free…it’s a minor defect but one that could so easily have been avoided.
• The smell of blood will make sharks go into a feeding frenzy and make all converge, making the rescue act we were shown well-nigh impossible
• The last set-up, was just too silly and too filmy.
• The end destroyed any shreds of credibility that had remained thus far. Basically, the director and scriptwriter fell in love with some characters and ensured their survival and well-being against all odds. Most of the limited audience in the hall was laughing at the end and I’m sure that’s not the desired response in an action thriller

Imran acted decently, despite some awkwardness in the unnatural dialogue while flirting. Sanjay, Danny and Mithun all reconfirmed their screen presence. The little package from Chak De, Chitrashi Rawat, continued to entertain. Ravi Kishan provided some of the funny, psycho type moments, especially the hilarious ‘itna sannata kyun hai bhai’. Shruti has a mixed review, she’s undoubtedly good-looking and has thankfully taken after Sarika in this department, but her dialogue delivery is a bit forced. Plus her role was not clear, was she meant to be a tough cookie or a softie ? Again, not clearly sketched out by the film makers, probably not her fault and so more evidence needed on her.

I know what happened here. The makers felt compelled to throw in distracting elements – love songs, item numbers, silly sub-plots and a farcical in their desire for commercial gain. They could’ve achieved far more success by just keeping it simple.

The Wrestler



Rating : 7/10
Release Date : Jan ‘09
Time : 111 minutes
Director : Darren Aronofsky; Writer : Robert Siegel
Starring : Mickey Rourke; Marisa Tomei; Evan Rachel Wood

This is a compelling slice of life, shows us nothing extra-ordinary, just a few days in the twilight years of a WWF wrestler but delivers a film that despite being slow paced, keeps you hooked till the end.

Mickey Rourke stars as a ‘retired’ wrestler who’s struggling to make ends meet. Who’s only source of revenue are exhibition fights and the autograph signing sessions prior to them. Who’s not met his daughter for years. Who has a crush on this cute lap-dancer. Who tries, against his grain, to do a regular job in a supermarket. And who’s clearly suffering health-wise from something bad.


The film succeeds on several fronts. It gives a fascinating insight into the world of wrestling, the steroid pumping, the faked stunts and choreographed moves, the enthusiastic fans and the strange lives of the wrestlers who reach their sell by date as they live for the autograph sessions and the weekends where they meet others of their ilk but have to somehow find a way to make the week go past and a way to keep the money coming in.


It shows Mickey struggling to get his life together – when he tries the job behind the fresh meat counter – he has some good days and some clearly bad ones. And some good customers and some clearly bad ones, who’re fussy and finicky to the point of distraction. His daughter clearly has no interest in her father and one doesn’t really blame her as you cant just turn up after several years, with a couple of gifts and hope to make things ok. He also has to find love and companionship and here he is irresistibly drawn into the arms of a cute lap dancer, but one who has strict rules about mixing business with pleasure.


But it succeeds most of all, in showing the ultimate dilemma he faces…whether to go quietly or to crash and burn in a blaze of glory ? As his abused body begins to protest violently, the medical opinion is clear – stop the drugs, stop the wrestling and take it easy or else. And Mickey tries, tries hard. For the sake of his daughter, Marisa Tomei and life.

For me, it was also fascinating to watch Mickey Rourke. The abiding image I have of him in my head is the chocolate faced yet devious boy/man in ‘Nine and a Half Weeks'. To watch him now, the muscle-bound, almost ugly, pumped up man was a bit of a shock and almost morbid in a way. It suited the character almost perfectly though, as you sensed a very similar life path and trajectory.

In the end the choice he took made sense and was beautiful despite the tragic undertones. As was the film….

Sivaji, The Boss


Rating : 6/10
Release Date : June ‘07
Time : 185 minutes
Director & Writer : S Shanker; Music : A R Rahman
Starring : Rajnikanth, Shriya Saran, Vivek, Suman

This is a Rajnikanth masala movie through and through. If this genre appeals, go for it as you wont get any better and may not get too many more. Else, please avoid at all costs.


The premise, though hardly relevant, is that of an NRI who returns and wants to do good, open up universities and hospitals which will be world class but free. But obviously doesn’t find it easy in terms of getting permissions, has to grease a few palms and then some more. Has to deal with politicians who are only interested in their percentage. And also runs foul of a person who is a power broker and runs colleges / hospitals and fears his business will run aground if Sivaji succeeds in his mission. All these forces combine to reduce Sivaji to a pauper and put him behind bars.


Sivaji then decides no-more Mr Nice Guy and from then on nothing can stop our hero. He comes up with an interesting way to liberate black money and then uses that to fund his venture and ensure every village and township of Tamil Nadu prospers. In all this, he also finds the time to woo (hilarious courtship) the delectable Shriya Saran and sing many a song in fancy locales (the Guggenheim at Bilbao among them) and elaborate sets. He also does his trademark moves with chewing gums and coins, changes more dresses than Imelda Marcos and has several disguises designed to fool cops and others but never the audience.

Like I said, its great if you like this kind of stuff. I don’t think over-the-top agrees with me anymore. And this one is so blatantly over the top, that even James Bond, Superman and others of their ilk will shudder to go there.

The International


Rating : 4/10
Release Date : Feb ‘09
Time : 118 minutes
Director : Tom Tykwer; Writer : Eric Singer
Starring : Clive Owen, Naomi Watts, Armin Mueller-Stahl, Ulrich Thomsen

Standard fare, a spy thriller where its known right from the beginning who’s the villain & who’s the hero but we judge the film purely on how much fun we have watching one take down the other. The script is quite implausible, the dialogue ordinary / normal and as there are no fancy cars or fancy women, its understandable why this didn’t make the screen sizzle. Clive Owen’s coldness added to the lack of heat and is matched only by the German villain’s, though in the latter case it was probably deliberate.

What’s good here are the locations, they picked nice cities and didn’t just go for the obvious landmarks but some interesting venues. There is a good shootout scene in a museum, interesting just for the sheer scale and audacity of it all and another chase in Istanbul on the rooftops. Armin Mueller-Stahl (from Eastern Promises) continues to impress me for the credibility he brings to the screen.

Buy the dvd only if its on a bargain sale – the kind where if you buy something else, you get it free. I saw it on a flight and that’s probably the best place to watch it, as its decently paced and simple to understand even after you’ve downed a couple of drinks.

Two Lovers


Rating : 3/10
Release Date : Nov ‘08
Time : 110 minutes
Director & Co-Writer : James Gray; Co-Writer : Ric Menello;
Starring : Joaquin Phoenix, Gwyneth Paltrow, Vinessa Shaw

This is one of the films I didn’t get. Sure, there was a good performance by Joaquin Phoenix (worthy of an Oscar nomination ? Not really, I think that’s more reflective of a bare cupboard), decent one by the two women, who also happen to be the lovers.


That, in short, is what the film is about. A guy, who is a little weird / lives with his parents, and suddenly has to choose between two women. One, who’s kind of arranged, daughter of a family friend. And the other, a neighbour, also a little weird, a bit self centered, in love with someone else but not sure, seeking advice and comfort from our guy.

And finally, our guy decides. Its slowish, mildly interesting at best, but never really grabs you and makes you feel for any of the characters. The one scene, though, that was really enjoyable was when Gwyneth asks Joaquin to join her & her friends for a party. Watching this nerdy, geeky, weird guy transform in the cab and on the dance floor was good fun.

I think the key issue here was lack of involvement. None of the characters were truly that nice or interesting enough to make me care. And without that, this was just another ship that passed me by at night…

Superbad


Rating : 6/10
Release Date : Aug ‘07
Time : 114 minutes
Director : Greg Mottola; Writer : Seth Rogen, Evan Goldberg;
Starring : Jonah Hill, Michael Cera, Christopher Mintz-Plasse, Seth Rogen, Bill Hader, Eva Stone, Aviva


Two nerdy high-school kids, fast friends, decide that they must have sex before reaching college. Their best, and in their eyes, almost only chance lies in this cool party where they’re requested by these hot chicks to get the booze. So far, so good, but then all else doesn’t go to plan, rather goes spectacularly wrong, not just bad but ‘superbad’ !



They enlist the help of another friend, they get fake id’s, they meet mobsters, they get into fights. And they meet two hilarious cops, who clearly have a unique way of looking at things, who have a need for the limelight, a sense of humour that is politically incorrect, a desire to do things their own way.


It’s a nice film, some laugh out loud moments and genuine surprises but it kind of stopped there. Seen too many teen flicks for anything more than mild interest in the genre. And I’m probably the wrong target audience, so my comments are also ‘unfair’ in that sense. Watch if the genre interests you, its as good as such films can get is probably a fairer way of putting it.

Friday, July 17, 2009

Le Premier Jour Du Reste De Ta Vie


Rating : 7/10
Release Date : July ‘08
Time : 114 minutes
Director & Writer : Remi Bezancon
Starring : Jacques Gamblin, Zabou Breitman, Deborah Francois, Marc-Andre Grondin, Pio Marmoi


The First Day of the Rest of Your Life

Simply brilliant way to tell a story…

This tells us the tale of the Duval family, comprising parents and three kids (2 boys and a girl), by showing us only 5 days in their life, though spanning some twenty years. We watch the kids grow, the parents age, the characters develop, deal with death and loss, celebrate birthdays, anniversaries and really understand what makes the individuals tick.






Its amazing how much we can learn about people merely watching them go about their lives over five days.
• Papa Duval – drives a taxi, is a very loving father (though has a hills and valleys kind of relationship with his kids), not very demonstrative as most men are, and is fighting against his father most of the time, struggling to find recognition and love, which he feels was always denied to him

• Mama Duval – lovely, trying to cope with middle-age, seeking her own place in the household (as most housewives are), joins a course in college and much to her delight, even shares some classes with her daughter

• Daughter Duval – much to her dismay, has to share some classes with her mom, we watch her grow from a little girl, looking up to her eldest brother, to a woman struggling to find love within her family and outside

• Eldest son – the rebel of the family, cant wait to get out of the house, wants to make his own mark, doesn’t think much of his father or younger brother though does try to be protective (till he falls in love) of his younger sister

• Younger son – the odd one, quiet, artistic, part DJ / part connossieur, finds hidden reserves of discipline and dedication when given an unexpected opportunity by his grandfather


How they interact with each other, how their relationship develops and how each one of them in their own way finds peace and love is shown in the most beautiful, real and gripping way possible



People in Hindi cinema who write complicated and convoluted plots have much to learn from this little gem in terms of script writing, editing and narrative style. And actors who exaggerate (don’t think I need to name them) can learn much from the excellent understated performances of each of the actors. All in all, a lovely slice of life film that makes us look inwards into our own relationships and actions…

Thursday, July 16, 2009

Bride Wars


Rating : 5/10
Release Date : Jan ‘09
Time : 89 minutes
Director : Gary Winick ; Writer : Greg DePaul, Casey Wilson, June Diane Raphael ;
Starring : Kate Hudson, Anne Hathway, Bryan Greenberg, Chris Pratt, Steve Howey

This is a concept made for India. Its about two best friends, who ever since they were kids, have wanted to get married at a particular venue, the Plaza. Both co-incidentaly get engaged at the same time, and then due to a quirk of fate, it becomes obvious that only one of them will get to fulfil her dream, while the other will have to choose another venue. And neither of them is in a mood to compromise !

Sparks fly, friendships and relationships are put in jeopardy to ensure that they have the perfect wedding. Obvious solutions, suggested by their fiance’s – one of them getting married at another venue (‘do you know how long I’ve dreamed of this’) or doing a double wedding (‘it’s the one day for myself’) – are quickly and ruthlessly cast aside


The two friends soon turn to bitter enemies and the funny moments come when they dream up innovative ways to begin to sabotage each others wedding plans. The two characters shown are also contrasting types – one a ball-busting corporate lawyer and the other a much more pliable, dormant school teacher. However, these are never fully built up and the script lacks conversation / dialogue where the inner thoughts of the characters are explored and we understand what really is driving them. The role of their common friends is also minimised to point of implausibility – I mean, in reality, surely someone would’ve made one of them see sense ?

Its all quite obvious, very predictable (apart from the methods they use to sabotage each other – that was deliciously devious) but even so it was enjoyable for the journey and leaves you with one unshakeable moral of the story. Don’t mess with women and their wedding plans !